Halloween party ideas 2015

Ini Dampak Buruk Siswa Masuk Sekolah Terlalu Pagi TEMPO.CO , Jakarta: Jam sekolah terlalu pagi yang ditetapkan Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta tahun 2008, bertentangan dengan kondisi dan kebutuhan perkembangan anak. Sekretaris Jenderal Forum Serikat Guru Indonesia Retno Listyarti mengatakan siswa akan mudah lelah dan mengalami masalah pencernaan.








from Berita Nasional - Yahoo Indonesia News http://ift.tt/1vOKtFE


Comcast — no stranger to lining the pockets of those who can help the company get what it wants (or rewarding them afterward with high-paying jobs) — was befuddled earlier this week when it and Time Warner Cable were heavily criticized for plunking down a total of $132,000 to sponsor a dinner honoring FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn… who just happens to be in the process of reviewing the two companies’ pending merger. Realizing that maybe this might look like something just short of bribery, the cable giants have decided to pull their money — sort of.

Deadline reports that Comcast (responsible for $110K of the total donation) and TWC will no longer be sponsoring the upcoming Walter Kaitz Foundation dinner, where Clyburn is being honored.


Comcast asked the Kaitz Foundation that “there be no recognition of Comcast at the dinner,” explaining that “We do not want either the Commissioner or Kaitz to fall under a shadow as a result of our support for diversity in the cable industry….By the same token, we do not want to punish Kaitz or detract from its important work.”


The company maintains that implications of buying Clyburn’s support “are insulting and not supported by any evidence.”


No evidence? We’d like to point to former FCC Commissioner Meredith Atwell Baker, who helped champion Comcast’s merger with NBC and was then rewarded with a job as a D.C.-based lobbyist for Comcast.


Time Warner Cable also gave a statement about how it pulled its piddling $22,000 contribution. Good for them.


The companies are still giving their money to the Kaitz Foundation, but will be doing it through different channels, instead of by sponsoring a party to honor one of the few people who has the leverage to shut down its merger plans.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Last year, we lamented the long hiatus of one of our favorite sites, Not Fooling Anybody, which featured makeovers of former chain storefronts that were, as the name states, not fooling anybody. What we didn’t know was that the site has been revived, in the form of a community on Reddit. Let the yellow-painted Pizza Huts roll!


We love tweaks to the American chainscape, so here are some of our favorite recent submissions to the subreddit.


This former Blockbuster Video can’t rent you any new releases, but they can help you achieve the latest hairstyles. Maybe.


(alexandrsalamandr -Reddit)

(alexandrsalamandr – Reddit)



This Subway that started out as an old-school KFC would look a lot better with a cupola. It could have a sandwich-shaped weathervane on top.



The windows make this a very recognizable former Taco Bell. Taco Bucks? Star Bell? It’s beautiful, anyway.



This former Burger King is actually quite lovely.


(KrispyKayak - Reddit)

(KrispyKayak – Reddit)



It even retained its square roadside sign with rounded corners.


oishii

(KrispyKayak – Reddit)



Happy Jack’s Biscuits and Gravy has lost its trapezoidal windows and signature roof hump, but everyone still knows that it used to be a Pizza Hut.


(KrispyKayak - Reddit)

(KrispyKayak – Reddit)



It’s hard to disguise a former Circuit City without extensive renovations.


lovelady_thrift

(Reddit – iamactuallyalion)



Really, really hard. Even if you put up a nice sign.


(Reddit - ltcarter47)

(Reddit – ltcarter47)



This Five Guys in a former Pizza Hut is an American treasure. Don’t let anyone tell you different.



NotFoolingAnybody [Reddit]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist


It was once as American as, well, blue jeans to start your day with a bowl of cereal and milk. Breakfast grains were once major sponsors behind kid-oriented television programming, or licensed beloved fictional characters to put on cereal boxes. Now sales at major cereal companies are down, and a variety of reasons are contributing to the decline.

Earnings at Kellogg are down 15%, but it’s not just the big, expensive brand names that are falling out of favor. Cereal sales overall are down about 6%…the same amount that denim sales have fallen. Oh, no, America, what’s happening?


It’s a combination of things. Many Americans have to adjust their diets for celiac disease, which eliminates many traditional grains from their diets. On a wider scale, parents have finally figured out that maybe sugar-encrusted bits of wheat and marshmallows are not the most nutritious thing that children could eat first thing in the morning. “With childhood obesity at historically high levels, health-conscious parents are aiming to cut down the volume of breakfast cereals consumed by their offspring,” pointed out one industry analyst in a report.


What are we eating instead? Cereal companies aim to get into the breakfast shake and cereal bar business, figuring that maybe we’ll eat those as we hurry out the door. We might still eat granola, but less of it, and sprinkled in a container of Greek yogurt.


Why Don’t Americans Like Breakfast Cereal Anymore? [AdWeek]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

Aparat gabungan obrak-abrik tempat maksiat di Pantai Purus MERDEKA.COM. Aparat gabungan dari Satpol PP, Polisi, TNI dan dinas terkait kota Padang kembali melakukan pembongkaran terhadap tenda-tenda ceper di kawasan Pantai Purus, Kota Padang. Kawasan ini diduga kerap dijadikan tempat melakukan tindakan maksiat."Lokasi di sini ini akan dijadikan kawasan wisata keluarga dan harus tidak ada lagi maksiat," ujar Kepala Dinas Pariwisata Kota Padang, Dian Fikri saat operasi penertiban, Kamis (14/8).Dalam penertiban tersebut, petugas menurunkan satu unit alat berat untuk meratakan lokasi pantai yang sudah ditimbun dengan ban bekas dan karung berisikan pasir. ...








from Berita Nasional - Yahoo Indonesia News http://ift.tt/1mNZga0

HUT RI, 3 napi korupsi juga dapat remisi MERDEKA.COM. Tiga narapidana kasus korupsi di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta tercatat turut mendapatkan remisi umum atau pengurangan masa hukuman bertepatan peringatan Hari Kemerdekaan Republik Indonesia 17 Agustus 2014."Ketiga napi yang mendapat remisi umum 17 Agustus tersebut saat ini menjalani hukuman di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas IIA Yogyakarta, Mereka belum bebas, masih harus menjalani sisa masa hukuman," kata Kepala Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (Lapas) Klas IIA Yogyakarta, Zainal Arifin, Kamis (14/8). Demikian dikutip antara. ...








from Berita Nasional - Yahoo Indonesia News http://ift.tt/1BhmDTl

twitterfail As you’ve probably heard, in the wake of actor Robin Williams’ death earlier this week, his daughter Zelda Williams was subjected to some particularly nasty messages on Twitter, causing her to close her account on the service rather than have to sort through hurtful, nasty statements from strangers. This is not good news for Twitter, which now has to answer to stockholders. And so the company is saying it’s looking into how to prevent this sort of thing from happening in the future, but there’s a bigger question — is that even possible?


“We will not tolerate abuse of this nature on Twitter,” said Del Harvey, Twitter’s vice president of trust and safety (yes, that’s a real job; one that probably pays better than yours or mine… combined). “We have suspended a number of accounts related to this issue for violating our rules and we are in the process of evaluating how we can further improve our policies to better handle tragic situations like this one.”


In terms of specifics, Harvey says, “This includes expanding our policies regarding self-harm and private information, and improving support for family members of deceased users.”


But what does any of that actually mean? And would any of it do anything to stop people from being horrible jerks on Twitter?


The answer to that second question, in my opinion, is a big “no.”


We live in a world where everyone old enough to hold onto an iPhone has the ability to anonymously indulge their most base instincts; to say things that would they would never say to someone’s face (or even in a forum where their real names were known); to hurt others for the sheer, possibly psychotic, joy of inflicting emotional pain.


The Internet is still in its adolescence, and a small but potent section of its users are behaving accordingly.


Unfortunately, this id-liberating freedom is something we all endure because the only way to restrict it is to restrict the things that also make the Internet function as a mass-communication tool.


The Anonymity Conundrum


The true double-edged sword of the Internet. For better and worse, it also allows you to write things that you might not have the freedom to write under your own name.


On the positive end of the spectrum, Internet anonymity offers an outlet for whistleblowers, dissidents, and victims to speak openly about the harm done to them or others without fear of retribution.


At the other end of that spectrum, anonymity is used as a shield from which cowards can hide while insulting, harassing, bullying, or outing people — often people they don’t know.


But is there any way to get rid of the latter while retaining and protecting the former?


You can’t require that all Twitter accounts use real names. It not only strips away the much-needed shield of anonymity from those who don’t abuse it, and it would have the effect of creating a privileged class among corporate or group accounts, where the actual human being Tweeting for Airline X or Cable Company Z remains anonymous but individuals must be named.


Twitter also couldn’t compromise and say “you can have a publicly anonymous user name, but we’ll need verifiable proof of ID.”


We live in a time when many people are — justifiably — already concerned about the large number of people who have their personal information. Being forced to go through a vetting process where you’re sharing that data with a company for no better reason than so you can blast out 140-character notes to the public, isn’t going to go over well.


Can A Better Reaction Be Proactive?


As things stand now, there is little that Twitter or its users can do to proactively avoid or block jerks. You can make your account private, limiting access to your feed to only approved members, but that doesn’t stop people from posting horrible things directed at you. At best, you can occasionally suss out a creep, troll, etc., early before it has become a nuisance and block, ignore or report that account.


But that’s the rub — it’s all reactive, just like most of the real world.


Much like we don’t arrest people for their potential to rob a bank, Twitter doesn’t suspend an account because it may someday unleash a gaggle of nastiness upon another user.


But in the real world, it’s awfully hard for a bank robber to rob a bank from jail, while a blocked Twitter user can just create a new account and get straight back to trolling, however nasty.


Twitter could — and maybe it is — tracking IP addresses of these repeat offenders, but it’s incredibly easy to fake this information and make an abusive user look like he or she is posting from somewhere they are not. If Twitter started blocking every IP address used by malicious accounts, it would inevitably end up blocking countless legitimate users whose IP addresses have been spoofed.


And with Twitter’s stock back to where it started when the company went public less than a year ago, it’s not going to be doing anything that would deflate its user base.


All Twitter can really do is respond to complaints in a more expedient manner and have a lower tolerance for nastiness. It will still be playing Whack-A-Mole with trolls, but one can always get better at playing Whack-A-Mole.


The Inevitability Of A-Holes


From the dawn of man, there have been insufferable, nasty people on this planet who take enjoy hurting others. The Internet has just given them a new tool for doing so.


So, just like a carpenter who really loves hammering nails, it’s inevitable that some Twitter users will continue hurling insults, Photoshopping people into obscene photos, and inexplicably thinking they are being clever.


Even if Twitter were to compel users to post their real names, or be personally accountable for violations, there are some people who just don’t care, who would be proud to be publicly called out for lacking a moral compass or any sense of empathy.


All we can do is learn how to minimize how much they bother us.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist
Powered by Blogger.